In
order to accomplish great social movements, we must stop looking
at the discrete elements of social projects and start trying
to understand the complex relationships between them.
Getting to Maybe recognizes the
experiences of a wide range of people and organizations and
applies the insights of complexity theory in an effort to
lay out a brand new way of thinking about making change in
communities, in business, and in the world.
There is knowledge embedded in different
structures – illuminating and animating that knowledge
is a creative exercise and that's what Frances Westley, who
co-authored the book with Brenda Zimmerman and Michael Quinn
Patton, does. She brings together different knowledge sets
to solve problems. She helps to make the impossible happen.
Frances
Westley served as the Executive Director of the
McGill-McConnell Program, the first program to offer specialized
graduate-level education for national leaders in the voluntary
sector. Frances is also the James McGill Professor of Strategy
in the
Faculty of Management at McGill University and leads the
Social Innovation initiative, a partnership between DuPont
Canada and the Faculty of Management.
She is currently heading up the
Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, a think tank
for innovative thinking and environmental problem-solving
at University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is the first woman
to head the Institute.
Frances is an accomplished author and an
active consultant. She co-authored the recent book, Getting
to Maybe: How the World is Changed with Brenda Zimmerman
and Michael Quinn Patton. Learn more about Frances and her
journey here.
Back to top.
Writing Getting
to Maybe
While both prominent social innovators and
large-scale changes are often lauded and profiled, there are
few resources available that marry the two.
Frances Westley sees her life as a complex
journey through which she has gained unusual competencies.
As an expert on thinking about thinking, on thinking about
different knowledge sets, and then on incorporating such knowledge,
Frances has used her interest in social innovation to support
complexity.
Along with Brenda and Michael, she asks,
“What could I offer? And, what does the world need?”
Getting to Maybe reflects these questions and offers
a practical guide to social innovation for others in the field,
as well as for anyone who wants to make a difference but are
unsure where to start.
Back to top.
Finding synchronicity
A movement for change represents an important
stage of social innovation. This stage begins when people
begin to feel outrage or discontent towards larger system
forces, such as changes in the economy or a disease epidemic.
When such people begin to feel as if they
can no longer endure such large system forces, they begin
to connect in a variety of ways. It is often at this moment
that social innovators step in to help achieve synchronicity.
Part of the dynamic of social innovation
that moves a movement from an exploration to a movement for
change occurs when social innovators connect to a larger group
of people. A social innovator can help to develop movements
for change in a number of ways:
- They are able to articulate the general malaise.
- They are able to articulate and reflect a group’s
discontent and contribute threads for a new way of doing
things.
- They are able to feed off of the movement so that it
can move much more quickly.
Back to top.
The
link between social innovation and movements for change
Movements for change can be seen
as one piece of the cycle of social innovation.
For
a movement to have an effect, it must move beyond the grassroots.
That is why social innovators and their leadership is so critical.
Innovations can occur anywhere in a system.
As social innovators seek transformation, they must shake
loose the resources that are invested in the old way of doing
things.
Social innovation is the first loop of the
eco-cycle. The back loop is where people work together. The
whole movement for change occurs when the movement is out
and at play. Some leaders can operate beyond the initial stages
of a movement, others are active only in particular stages
of innovation, and few are present from beginning to end.
Back to top.
Tips for social
innovators
- Most social innovators have a knack for sensing when
a movement is underway, and this skill can be honed. Allow
yourself to think deeply about this phase and build knowledge
about your environment.
- Despite deep thought, intuition is an important guide
and indicator of developing movements for change. Chapter
5 of Getting to Maybe addresses the surge of
energy that social innovators must be able to ride.
- Power can be an emergent wave of energy that is difficult
to control. Social innovators must understand how to go
with the flow of a movement. At the same time, they must
understand the system they are engaged in, complete with
its authoritative hierarchy.
- It is virtually impossible to engage in social innovation
without facing extreme isolation and failure. The ability
to see this as a deep place of learning in a complex system
of innovation is important. This moment of isolation is
also experienced in moments of success. Take care to find
comfort somewhere in between these two extremes.
- Not every social change is a social innovation. We
spend most of our lives trying to address change where
it is needed. These changes add up to make fundamental
differences. Sometimes, however, change is only made in
increments. The important thing to remember is that both
fundamental and incremental changes are important to social
innovation.
- Do what you feel you can do and follow your capacities.
If enough of us are following our beliefs, there is enormous
room for change. There are times, along the way, when
resources become available for new ways of doing things.
Back to top.
Thoughts for
further exploration
We asked Frances Westley to articulate some
questions and ideas to help us expand our understanding of
social innovation and movements for change. Here are some
questions to consider:
- How do we improve our ability to link our capacities
to scale? How do we understand and get a handle on the
richness of possibilities that are happening on the ground?
- Social innovators can easily get burnt out from working
on multiple levels. Do we have the resources to keep them
energized?
- How do we connect to today's young social innovators
and incorporate their unique perspective?
- How do you hold a paradox in place, especially when
you never get to a perfect solution?
- Brenda Zimmerman often speaks of, "The arrogance
of the goal, and the humility of me." As little cogs
in the wheel, what impact can we really have?
- Visions often incorporate old ideas. How do we push
ourselves and the hierarchies of power to generate new
ideas for development?
Back to
top.
Getting
to Maybe: How the World is Changed - In this
book, authors Frances Westley, Brenda Zimmerman and Michael
Quinn Patton lay out a brand new way of thinking about making
changes in communities, the business, and the world. Written
for ordinary people who want to make connections that will
create extraordinary outcomes, this book looks at complexity
theory to make the impossible happen.
McGill-McConnell
Program - The first program to offer specialized
graduate-level education for national leaders in the voluntary
sector
Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies -
This institute at the University of Wisconsin-Madison focuses
on understanding the relationships between people and the
planet, and on seeking solutions to environmental problems
on all scales.
The
Resilience Alliance - The Resilience
Alliance is a multidisciplinary research group that explores
the dynamics of complex adaptive systems.
Experiments
in Consilience – This book,
co-authored by Frances Westley, describes the work of the
Biodiversity Research Network. Members of this network examine
the ecology and population dynamics of key species in particular
ecosystems in order to understand the impact of human populations,
and to develop tools and processes for involving a greater
variety of stakeholders in conservation efforts.
A
Change Would Do You Good
– This paper, co-authored by David Cooper of Case Western
Reserve University, looks at how the failure to organize can
cause an organization to become trapped in unsatisfactory
situations.
Back to
top. |