| Many communities around the world are recognizing
the importance of community engagement in preparing citizens
for disasters like the one New Orleans faced in 2005 with Hurricane Katrina.
When disaster strikes there is no room or
time for blame. Reflecting on the situation in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, we’re left to wonder
could better emergency preparedness using community
engagement methodologies have made a difference? What can we
learn?
This page provides a place to explore this issue more fully. Here, we’ll share questions we have about
the New Orleans disaster and the ensuing community collapse. You will also find links to articles and
stories we have found that explore the connection between community engagement and emergency preparedness.
Immediately after Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans, our talk in the office was focused on the latest reports of the disaster and its aftermath. We shared the stories and the photos, mourned and empathized for the victims of
the storm.
We also asked questions. They’re
likely some of the same questions you asked yourself.
The list below is a starting point – each question is
a catalyst for conversation, some are calls to action.
- If people were “engaged” – had a
role to play, knew what to do, were part of a team –
would this have made a difference?
- Ownership – Who owned the Emergency Preparedness
Plan?
- What preparations were made? Were citizens “engaged”?
- How prepared are we? What’s my emergency preparedness
plan?
- How much can government do alone? What do citizens
do?
- Why do citizens become criminals?
- Is the make up of the population – demographic
makeup/geographic layout a factor in emergency preparedness?
- Are some countries more effective than others at emergency
preparedness?
- What role does formal/informal leadership play?
- Are there models/stories/resources we can share?
Back to top.
August 2005, New Orleans: A city utterly devastated by a hurricane; a community unprepared is caught in a spiral of human despair. Citizens out of control, chaos results in total community collapse. What went wrong? Could an engaged community have made a difference?
The physical damage and devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans has been compounded by the breakdown of community. Did all the "good people" leave before they had a chance to do good? What was the plan for the everyday citizen? Did it go beyond “everyone for themselves and get out as quickly as possible?"
Each day new heartbreaking stories emerge from the ravaged city. Those aren’t the stories we want to read. We want to read stories of good Samaritans helping those in need - stories of everyday heroes helping others, citizens bridging and working together to reach out and support each other. Where are those stories?
In preparing people for what was seemingly inevitable, did New Orleans develop a community preparedness plan using community engagement techniques? Would we have more good news stories if they had?
Brian Wolshon, a Louisiana State University civil engineering professor who served as a consultant on the state evacuation plan, is quoted in the New York Times as saying that the city’s planning relied almost entirely on a “Good Samaritan scenario,” that is, that residents would check on elderly and disabled neighbors and drive them out of the city if necessary.
That was the thinking,” he said. “Maybe even the cornerstone of that plan”.
And yet, within the City of New Orleans’ Comprehensive Emergency Management plan, there is little indication of how this strategy might have been implemented. Given the chaos that followed Katrina, it’s fair to ask if the strategy was implemented at all. Was it just assumed that people would help? Was there a coordinated effort before the crisis hit to involve citizens and to prepare them to help each other following the hurricane?
Many communities around the world are recognizing the importance of community engagement in preparing citizens for disasters like the one New Orleans is facing.
There is no room or time for blame, but we can begin to articulate unanswered questions. In this spirit, Tamarack is creating a web page dedicated to questions we have about the New Orleans disaster and the ensuing community collapse.
On this page you will find questions we have, links to articles and stories we have found of community engagement and emergency preparedness, a bulletin board in which you might pose your questions or thoughts about community breakdown and links to some agencies that are helping in this time of need.
New Orleans – What happened?
Back to top.
At first glance the cities of Seattle and Brisbane would seem to have little in common with the barangay of Talba, in Central Luzon, Philippines. However, the three communities are more alike than a cursory glance would deem – for they are all communities that are planning for disasters, and how to avoid them, using community engagement techniques.
Each has a community engagement strategy that involves citizens helping each other when disaster strikes. The premise of such strategies is that if neighbours and citizens are prepared to mutually help each during a disaster, lives can be saved and property damage will be minimized.
Below you will find a collection of resources
and case studies that further outline the link between emergency preparedness and
community engagement.
About
Emergency Preparedness & Community Engagement
Charter
for Community Engagement - This document, created
by the Queensland Government Department of Emergency Services (Brisbane, Australia,
describes the role community engagement principles play in
emergency preparedness. It is one of the most comprehensive
guides to community engagement and emergency preparedness
that exists on the web. The document argues that better solutions
result when communities and government are engaged in information
sharing and discusses this theme in the context of the Queensland
Government’s Department of Emergency Services Community
Engagement Unit. Access the document here.
Philippines Community
Based Disaster Management - This paper, written by Lorna
P. Victoria, director of the Centre for Disaster Preparedness,
describes various aspects of community based disaster management
(CBDM) by highlighting best practices in the Philippine Disaster
Management Forum. Access the paper here.
Community
Based Disaster Management - This paper, written by
Bishnu Pandey and Kenji Okazaki of the UN Centre for Regional
Development, outlines various UNCRD programs designed
to promote sustainable development and disaster reduction.
The paper argues that both are essential preconditions for
each other. Access the paper here.
Role of Local Institutions in Reducing Vulnerability - This paper, prepared by
the Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre, examines
the role of local institutions in reducing vulnerability to
recurrent natural disasters. Also discussed is the role of
local institutions in promoting sustainable livelihoods development
in high risk areas. Access the paper here.
The Case for People Centered Disaster Management
- This presentation produced by Duryog Nivaran – South
Asian Network for Disaster Mitigation, outlines the case
for a bottom-up approach to disaster management. It also highlights
how creating a culture of disaster preparedness can save thousands
of lives and billions of dollars in damages. Access the presentation here.
Back to top.
Case
Studies
CERT
(Community Emergency Response Team) - This case
study describes the Community Corps – Community
Emergency Response Team (CERT), and how they assist communities
in meeting their needs in times of emergency. Also contained
is a training curriculum for the program as well as a brief
section on how begin involvement in a local CERT
program. Access the case study here.
Preparedness
(SDART) - This case study describes the Seattle
Disaster Aid & Response Teams (SDART) and how they
can assist communities in preparing for emergencies. The team
believes that effective cooperation and communication between
a City and its inhabitants is the only sure way to prepare
for a disaster. Access the case study here.
Citizens’
Participation Toward Safer Communities - This
case study, by Zenaida G. Delica, describes how community
planning and preparedness in the Philippines saved many lives
when and overflow of volcanic debris and molten lava destroyed
the village of Talba. Access the case study here.
Back to top.
Coping
with Disaster
Community
Disaster Education - This American Red Cross
article describes the benefits of community disaster education,
including steps individuals can take to ensure they are prepared
to meet the challenges of unforeseen disasters. Included is
a plan entitled “Together We Prepare” containing
steps like making a plan, building a kit, getting trained,
volunteering, and giving blood. Access the article here.
Latinos
Preparados: Helping Community Prepare for Disaster
- This case study describes the concepts and activities of
Latinos Preparados while they prepare Latin American
individuals to cope with disasters. Also included is contact
information and steps for becoming involved in Latinos Preparados.
Access the case study here.
Ideas
for Community-Based Disaster Planning - This
paper, prepared by the Arlington County Civic Federation,
describes some possible community planning ideas for dealing
with emergencies and disasters. Some sections include educating
yourself, educating you civic organization, developing a disaster
response plan, and much more. Access the paper here.
Back to top.
New
Orleans & Emergency Preparedness
City’s
Balance Undone in Many Ways - This New York
Times article, describes the events in New Orleans
immediately after the hurricane and what went wrong during emergency operations in a city
of nearly 500,000 people. At one point in the article, Brian
Wolshon, an LSU civil engineering professor, states that New
Orleans relied almost exclusively on a “Good Samaritan”
plan, where citizens check on elderly and disable neighbours
and assist them in evacuation if necessary. Access the article
here.
New Orleans Comprehensive Emergency Plan
- This document contains the hurricane emergency management
plans of New Orleans. It details four phases of action, including
preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation, and the steps
to take for each phase. It will be useful for contrasting
the planned response with the actual response in New Orleans.
Access the document here.
Back to top.
Additional
Resources
|